I agree with all the inferences and facts and yet remain a creationist. How so? The inference behind inference 3 is that over time, the differences will shift to create brand-new genetic information. This has never been observed. We’ve only ever observed a decrease. So although we get different species – it is always the result of a degradation of genetic information.
Here is the concept put in simple terms: https://twitter.com/GraceWithSalt/status/480110078927077376
If all we observe through mutation and natural selection is a degradation of genetic information, what is the mechanism by which we get from a rock to a human? Evolution occurs because there is change – but that does not mean what you think it means.
This is simply illogical. Mutations are random, therefore any mutation can be reversed. If a mutation from state A to state B means loss of information, then mutation from state B to state A means increase of information.
How do you get to state B initially? From State A. Therefore going back to State A is not new information. It already existed.
Are you saying that we have never seen mutations? Really? Because that’s brand-new genetic information. In fact, a “decrease” (you’re misusing the term) is still brand-new genetic information. But not only that, you’re just purely wrong. We have seen E. coli digest nylon- that requires an “increase” (god, please look up what you’re talking about) in genetic information as nylon hasn’t existed for more than 200 years.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Like our Facebook Page